Sunday, 13 October 2013

DataWind, TES India tie up to offer free educational resources

DataWind, TES India tie up to offer free educational resources

The partnership is aimed at enabling teachers to share teaching and learning material as well as help students locate career guide for themselves

DataWind has teamed up with TES India, an online community for teachers, to provide a library of ready-to-use teaching material to its end users.

DataWind is targeting teachers’ community via this strategic partnership. Teachers and institutions can choose to teach their students absolutely free of cost by using this library. They can also teach their students an international syllabus, which can help them keep in sync with global standards.

According to the strategic partnership, an application will be developed that will feature learning materials available for several courses like Bachelor of Arts, B.Com, B. Ed, general awareness, entire CBSE content, educational presentations, discussion on social topics and many more. The app can be used to learn and teach Sanskrit online.

Teachers can use the app to find employment for themselves while students can locate a great career guide for themselves.

Suneet Singh Tuli, CEO & President, Datawind said: “We aim to bring a PC Tablet for every student in India, but the hardware itself is not enough to serve the purpose of empowerment. This partnership will allow Datawind users to access high quality, interactive and engaging educational content for free. Also this partnership will strengthen teacher’s community so that they can deliver quality education which is a need of the hour by Young India.”

“We are delighted to be working with Datawind. We are committed to driving excellence in the education sector, and this partnership will help teachers to access the very best classroom resources – lesson plans, assessments, worksheets, presentations and more”, said Sachin Kapoor, General Manager, TES India.

“There is a selection of the most popular lesson plans covering math, English, geography, history, science, physical and health education and expressive arts. You can download as many of these lesson plans as you like for free - all you have to do is join TES India. Registration is free and takes less than a minute,” added Mr. Kapoor.

DataWind has entered into similar strategic alliance with various companies in the past. Last year, DataWind tied up with the Indian Express Group to bring its users the latest news and analysis on the go. For cricket enthusiasts, the company teamed up with cricket technology company CricHQ to pre-install CricHQ app on all their UbiSlate tablets.

Open Access vs academic power


Only the Open Access Movement can address the adverse impact of Western domination of the world of knowlege.

THAT the United States and its European allies dominate the world of knowledge is unquestionable. This is reflected in indicators of academic “output”. According to the National Science Foundation of the United States, the U.S. accounted for 26 per cent of the world’s total science & engineering (S&E) articles published in 2009 and the European Union for 32 per cent. In 2010, the U.S. share in total citations of S&E articles stood at 36 per cent and the E.U.’s share was 33 per cent, whereas Japan’s and China’s remained at 6 per cent each.

This domination comes from two, among other, sources. First, leadership in spending. Despite the growing importance of Asia (especially China), the U.S. remained the largest single R&D-performing country in 2009, accounting for about 31 per cent of the global total. The E.U. accounted for 23 per cent. Second, the ability to attract the world’s best talent. The foreign-born share of U.S. S&E doctorate holders in U.S. academia increased from 12 per cent in 1973 to nearly 25 per cent in 2008, and nearly half (46 per cent) of postdoctoral positions in 2008 were held by foreign-born U.S. S&E doctorate holders. A dominant share of these came from China and India. A similar trend holds in the social sciences, though exact data are not available.

There are a number of collateral consequences of these trends. One is what Jean-Claude Guedon calls the “structuring of power” in science, with the most powerful institutions and journals being based in the U.S. and Europe and having international reach. These institutions set the agenda and the standards for science. As a corollary, publishing in those journals with their high impact factor is becoming a marker of academic standing even in less developed countries of the periphery. For younger scholars, obtaining a PhD from abroad and publishing in international journals has become a prerequisite for obtaining jobs in the best universities even in developing countries.

There are a number of adverse consequences that this can have. In the sciences, for example, one consequence is that the research pursued in leading institutions in developing countries tails that in the developed world. As a result, there emerges a disjunction between science and production in these countries because, while science seeks to keep pace with the developed countries, production does not, since much of the economy remains “informal”. Or, as happens in the pharmaceuticals industry, there is a lack of correspondence between the drugs being researched and developed (under international influence over priorities) and the disease pattern that prevails in these countries.

In the social sciences, the problem can be more severe. North Atlantic domination often destroys plurality. In economics, for example, the resulting domination of neoliberal theory with its rhetoric of market fundamentalism, in which the market or ostensibly “free economic exchange” is presented as the most efficient mechanism to work the economic system, paves the way for policy that permits the increasingly unfettered functioning of private capital, both domestic and foreign. Markets are not benign, and the extent, nature and consequences of growth tend to be adverse. Such policies are pursued even when in the developed countries the state intervenes to restrain markets and supplement them. In practice, this amounts to recommending that developing countries should do as developed country governments say, and not as those governments actually do.

It is in this background that the relevance of the Open Access (O.A.) movement for the developing countries needs to be addressed. That movement tries to undermine the control exerted by the corporate sector over the distribution and sharing of knowledge, especially peer-reviewed scholarly research published in journals, generated largely with financial support from the state. A leading example of the movement is the Public Library of Science (PLOS), launched in 2000 with a letter that urged scientific and medical publishers to make research literature available for distribution through free online public archives, such as the U.S. National Library of Medicine’s PubMed Central. Nearly 34,000 scientists from 180 nations signed the letter, and the movement gained momentum when in 2003 PLOS launched itself as a publisher. Recently, the O.A. movement grew more targeted. In early 2012, 3,000 leading academics signed what is known as the “cost of knowledge” petition, which declared their intention to boycott publishing in, refereeing for or serving on the editorial board of journals published by Elsevier because it charges “exorbitantly high” prices for its journals and adopts indefensible trade practices like selling only “bundles” to libraries.

Such corporate behaviour is geared to maximising profit. Some journals cost thousands of dollars. To defend such pricing, the academic publishing industry imposes barriers such as copyright restrictions and distribution limitations on authors, and constructs pay walls in the form of subscriptions, licensing fees or pay-per-view rules. This restricts the sharing of knowledge and discriminates against those endowed with less resources than their peers in developed societies and richer institutions. It also results in the inefficiencies associated with journal publishing in the closed access world with long waiting times, publishing queues and delayed access, even at a cost.

Open Access uses the digital, online, free-of-charge model to disseminate peer-reviewed research and is in that sense hugely efficient and cost effective. It is also democratising. Those remotely located and without the resources to buy access to journal bundles, online sources or journal archives, can now have access to it. Without printing, the publishing time even with peer review is considerably shortened. Since costs of production are minimal for online journals the number of journals are far more than earlier, so that publishing queues and waiting times for publication shrink. More academics and their output are able to obtain a platform to disseminate their research. Realising the popularity of this mode of dissemination, the academic publishing industry is responding by changing its model. Instead of covering costs and earning hefty profits with individual submission fees and subscription charges, they are persuading universities and research institutions to pay for the cost of having the work of their staff peer reviewed, edited and distributed either in print or online. The goal remains the same: not better science, but a large profit.

Seen in this background Open Access is indeed democratising. But only partially. Open Access only helps democratise the distribution of peer-reviewed research. It does not democratise research activity itself, nor does it transform the peer review system, which for different reasons appears weighted in favour of a self-selecting elite. The issue to be addressed is whether O.A. would rid the system of journal branding and journal hierarchies. A journal’s “brand value” is created in the first instance by the fact that a group of academics leading a particular discipline establish or endorse the journal, and sometimes referee its contents. Given the credibility the journal carries, it is read by those who want to publish in it. They adopt the themes privileged by the journal and the articles published in it are cited as points of departure.

This process is given a “scientific” flavour with the use of metrics such as the citation index for articles and authors and the impact factor for journals. The impact factor measures the influence of a journal by the number of times work appearing in it was cited by others. A high impact factor leads to higher readership and makes the journal a must for all libraries. There are a number of obvious problems with this sequence. Popularity is not necessarily an index of quality. Self-referential research may deliver high citations but suppress originality, novelty and plurality. Citation does not guarantee readership, with one study finding that those citing works had not actually read as much as 80 per cent of them. The need to please potential reviewers may lead to indiscriminate citation. A “reputation” and high impact increase the reach of journals, feeding citation further.

It is this branding of journals, which allows a few to be identified as the best that need to be acquired by all librarians, that allows a private publisher controlling that journal to charge exorbitant prices and earn huge profits. But brands are not created by publishers but by academics who need journal rankings to separate out “better” publications and authors from the rest. Journal rankings are used by those who award grants and appoint staff but do not have the time or ability to themselves rate the work of applicants in increasingly specialised disciplines. So, given the structure of branding, it is unlikely that good work published in a relatively new open access journal would stand comparison with work published in a well-established journal.
Further, if the journal hierarchy is created by academics, then open access may aggravate rather than reduce the problem. With more readers able to easily access recognised journals, their readership and citation could go up, leading to a further privileging of those who obtain publishing access to those journals, rather than just readership access. The former may be influenced by a host of factors such as the location of the author in terms of country and university, the kind of questions raised and works cited, as opposed to some abstract indicator of quality. There is also strong evidence of confirmatory bias, or a tendency to rate better research that supports the views of the referee. As a result, there is little inter-referee agreement either on which articles deserve publishing or on how good an article is.

Such problems notwithstanding, peer review and journal publication gain importance because of a feature that is central to higher education under capitalism: the underfunding of education in the aggregate and the differential distribution of that funding across universities and departments. In time these inadequacies are justified in terms of having to create and promote a meritocracy in order to generate and award good science and knowledge. The worst form this takes is the metric-based evaluation system of universities and their research to decide on funding. That credentialist system that helps allocate “scarce resources” is based on journal ranking and publication.

Peer review is, in fact, given a credentialist role despite much evidence that the system can fail. This is partly illustrated by the growing evidence of retraction, or the reversal of the stamp of approval provided by leading journals that publish refereed articles. University of Regensburg Professor Björn Brembs extrapolates on the basis of articles published in a large database of thousands of medical journals, that given the rising rate of retraction, it is likely that by 2045 as many journal articles will be retracted as are being freshly published. He attributes this to the rewards system that makes choices on which journals to subscribe to and on which to privilege when making hiring and research-granting decisions based on the citations index. This puts pressure on those publishing to undertake their research keeping the citation prospect in mind. In the race to find a space in these journals, marketing of research rather than good science is the winner. One result is the high rate of retraction.

This is not a problem only in the science domain. The problem gets worse in the social sciences as the system is in many areas captured and used to privilege system-legitimising knowledge rather than pluralism. Hence the question as to why there was little “acclaimed” research in economics that foresaw or predicted the crisis of 2008. Unfortunately, rankings have their impact not only on what is read but on where scholars from developing nations need to publish to win academic standing. The result would be the skewing of academic research in these countries with grave consequences. That is a problem open access perhaps cannot address. It is not clear what will.

Re-define yourself to achieve success in life

Re-define yourself to achieve success in life

Do you see yourself not growing in your personal finance life or business? Would you want to achieve goals and be happy? Then you need to re-define yourself and transform your life, Rajiv Sharma, chief executive officer, NLP Nigeria limited has said.

He told the participants at a training programme on Critical Thinking: Problem Solving and Decision Making organized by Phillips Consulting in Lagos that in their business or personal life, they have to re-define in order not to go down.

“You have to re-innovate yourself, achieve new goals otherwise you will become stagnant in life”, he said.

Sharma, who is currently the General Manager, Training & Software Unit, Charms plc have all experiences. His experience chronology revealed that he Setup ICT Infrastructure for Training & Knowledge Acquisition SBU at Lagos, Abuja & Portharcourt in three months. He defined and initiated Software Projects for group companies. Rajiv assigned Project Managers to manage schedule, cost and delivery, while working to ensure the ultimate success and acceptance of the program by the client.

He Successfully implemented E-Learning & E-Library Project at FIRS, Revenue House Abuja, Project implementation involved teams from 3 different time zones (US-Washington D.C., Nigeria – Abuja, India – New Delhi).

Furthermore, he groomed efficient team to understand and deliver beyond the expectations of multiple stakeholders, designed Curriculums mapped to Microsoft, Oracle and Open Source Technology Certifications.

He researched array of new products: E-Library, E-Learning, Content Delivery and Web Portal, developed and put into practice Standard Operating Procedures, Systems and Structure for the SBU and Strategic Partnership Signed with International Companies: Blackboard, Sequentec and MindLeaders.

Rajiv has achieved over US$2million from the new product line with a profitability margin of 55 percent. He has designed several courses for National ID Card Management for Chams Consortium & NIMC and has successfully implemented programs for various clients spanning

Software Development Projects, Networking Projects and IT installations.

He was able to achieve all these because he re-defined himself. For instance, he took an Advanced Management Program at Lagos Business School, Lagos, Nigeria, after graduating in Science (B.Sc.) from Himachal Pradesh University, India and Diploma in Computer Application – H.P.U. Shimla , India.

Trainings attended by Sharma include Six Sigma Green Belt Certification Benchmark Six Sigma, New Delhi, India, Team Building & Interpersonal Effectiveness Indian Institute of Management, Ahmadabad, India, Strategic Market Planning for Profitability &Growth Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow, India.

Others are Creativity & Decision Making, XLRI, Jamshedpur, India, Blue Prints of Success Shiv Khera, New Delhi, India, and Neuro Linguistic Programing , ANLP India & Wisdom Tree.


Friday, 11 October 2013

Why Pay When You Can Get Good Software For Free

Why Pay When You Can Get Good Software For Free

Big name software often comes at a big price too. We’re not saying that you don’t get your money’s worth, but you can save a lot by going with these capable free options say Karan Bajaj & Hitesh Raj Bhagat.


Operating System
 
PAID - MICROSOFT WINDOWS 6,000
 
This is the price for the cheapest variant — Windows 7 Home Basic — which does not even include the entire Aero interface. Other advanced features missing on this version include multi-touch support, Windows Media Centre, Windows XP mode and multiple language support. You can get all these features, but you’ll have to spend more for Windows 7 Home Premium. If you want to go for the latest Windows 8 operating system, be ready to spend 12,999.
 
FREE - UBUNTU
www.ubuntu.com
 
There are different variants of Linux based free operating systems available for free. Ubuntu is one of the most popular free operating systems because it is easy to use, has low hardware requirements and includes the option to run from a USB drive or DVD. It comes with built-in document editing software, a chat client, email client and multimedia player. Most popular apps like Skype, Audacity, GIMP, Google Chrome and Steam are available for Ubuntu.
 
Image Editing PAID - ADOBE PHOTOSHOPCS6 51,597
 
For this huge price, you get the best image editing software available today. It comes with advanced features like type styles, vector layers, tilt shift effects, HDR editing and search layers. You can directly import RAW images from a camera for editing into Photoshop — obviously a big advantage for photographers. The user interface can be customised to suit your working needs and offers quick access to various tools and settings.
 
FREE – GIMP
 
Nothing comes close to the features and controls that Photoshop offers for image editing. However, as a free alternative, GIMP stands its ground with a very similar interface. It also has support for layers, channel mixer, clone and healing tools and works with majority of image formats such as TIFF, PSD, PNG. Support for different RAW formats can be enabled with plugins. A great thing about GIMP is that it is available for Windows, Linux as well as MAC.
 
Video Editing PAID - ADOBE PREMIERE 6,390
 
Adobe’s Premiere Elements 12 is an affordable and capable solution if you like to edit a lot of home movies. It has features designed for the novice and home user, including built in video tutorials, intelligent (automatic) video correction tools, various Hollywood-style effects and styles (like motion tracking: graphics that can move along with your subject) and finally, built in optimisation for upload to popular video sharing sites like YouTube and Vimeo.
 
FREE – LIGHTWORKS
 
Lightworks is a step in a different direction. This is a fullyfeatured, professional video editing program that you can download for free (no catch). It supports HD video editing and all the other features you need. There’s a steep learning curve but you can get started with the free tutorial videos on the website. A paid Pro version is also available — it adds greater codec support, 3D support and lifetime Pro membership to the Lightworks community and more.
 
Documents PAID - MICROSOFT OFFICE 5,499
 
This is the price for the Home and Student edition of Office 2013 with a single PC license. You get Word, PowerPoint, Excel and One Note in the package along with 7GB of Sky-Drive storage to store documents. It also includes Office web apps sync for Skydrive which lets you view, edit and share documents from a browser on any computer. If you also want Microsoft’s Outlook client for email, you will have to pay 14,999 for Office Home & Business edition.
 
FREE - OPEN OFFICE
 
This popular free office suite can be installed on any number of computers — there is no license or registration required. It comes with document, spreadsheet and presentation creators, a database editor, equation/formulae editor and a graphics editor. You can read and save documents in most commonly used formats including all Microsoft Office formats. The interface is very similar to Microsoft Office and takes no time to master.
 
Source | Economic Times | 9 October 2013

Soon Electronic Sc Study a click away

Agency | Daily News Analysis

Place | Pune

Date | October 3, 2013

Time | 2:40 IST

Soon Electronic Sc Study a click away

3 city professors to develop e-content as part of National Mission for Higher Education scheme

If all goes well, then in the next three years, lakhs of electronics science students will have free-of-cost study material on the web to refer to.

The content will be developed by three city-based professors from University of Pune, Fergusson College and Garware College and it will be made available through two dedicated websites–  e-shashwat and inflibinet.

Under the ministry of human resources’ National Mission For Higher Education scheme, the project of developing e-content for ‘Electronics Science’ has been given to the University of Pune.

Dr Arvind Shaligram, head of the department, electronics science, UoP, Dr Nitin Kulkarni from Fergusson College and Dr Pandharinath Buchade from Garware College have been selected to design the syllabus for the e-content. The content will be developed as per the syllabus prescribed for NET and SET examinations.

Kulkarni said that the aim is to provide up-to-date information in the field of electronics to lakhs of students across the country. “The best part about the project is that the websites will be interactive wherein students can browse through the subject. If needed, they can post their questions and answers will be given to them,” he added.

According to him, the ministry has observed that there are several colleges where because of unavailability of the books in the library, students find it difficult to learn the subject.

“There are times when small colleges are not able to prescribe the latest journals and the study material in the electronics science field due to financial crunch,” he added.

He added that any student misses a lecture of electronics science would be able to refer to the e-content and learn on their own. Speaking about the model of the syllabus, he said that there will be four sections. Kulkarni said that after the development of the content, it will be sent to a panel of 15 professors for reevaluation. The professors are from IITs and other renowned institutes.

Section-wise  content

First section: Content related to the subject where up-to-date information will be given on each and every topic.

Second section: Focuses on audio-video in which practical sessions will be shown and the lectures of some renowned professors will be kept available in the form of audio.

Third section: The students can give self-assessments and even pose any question

Fourth section: Additional references of scholars who have done extensive research in the field.

Knowledge Management In Education: A Key Driver Behind Organizational Success

Knowledge Management In Education: A Key Driver Behind Organizational Success
05 October, 2013


Introduction

One of the new ideas behind improving Educational quality is the systematic management of knowledge in schools. Knowledge management is a response to the explosion in information and the realization that knowledge is together with quality, a key driver behind organizational success. The problem is not how to find information, but to be able to successfully manage it. Knowledge management was a theme of Edwards Deming in his book, The New Economics (1974). Deming believed that all organizations should understand their knowledge sources, manage on the basis of rational data and make decisions based on all the available information.

The term knowledge management is applied to everything from the application of new technology to the much broader endeavors of trying to harness the intellectual capital of an organization. The idea is that knowing what we know and using it creatively and productively is the major source of economic value and competitive advantage at the disposal of any organization and is an idea that educational institutions need to take seriously. However, the educational organizations need to be clear that knowledge is more than information. More and better information does not mean that we are anymore knowledgeable. In fact often the opposite can be the case. Information by itself can often lead to confusion and overload. Information overload is one of today's most serious problems both for individuals and for organizations. It is the productive use of information that is important. A key to successful knowledge management is to exploit all forms of knowledge, both formal and informal. This can be achieved by developing an open knowledge-sharing culture and developing processes linked to appropriate technologies that facilitate the sharing and exploitation of all available information. Thus, what is more important today is that the educational organizations learn to develop a culture of knowledge-sharing and use of modern technologies to share and facilitate the sharing and use all available information.

What happens if we ignore our knowledge base?

There are a number of unfortunate consequences of ignoring the need to properly harness both institutional and individual knowledge. Some of the consequences are listed below:

•  Loss of expertise;
•  Lost or missed opportunities ;
•  having to reinvent the wheel;
•  Loss of knowledge of best practices ;
•  Loss of learning opportunities;
•  Damage to key stakeholder relationships;
•  Reductions in the quality of future knowledge;
•  Damage to the organization's culture and social capital;
•  The danger that other organizations will capitalize on ideas that were once their own because they could not harness their knowledge better

The new approach of “power sharing” and “effective and participatory management” challenges school managers to change from autocratic style based on laws and regulations towards an open approach of dialogue and consultation. School managers need to listen, consult and engage in dialogue more and identify needs of parents, teachers and learners.

Knowledge Management in Education

For any educational organization, knowledge is a key asset that creates and adds value to the organization's products and services. It is composed of those insights and understandings that give meaning to the information and data at the organization's disposal. Knowledge originates in the minds of knowing subjects who evaluate and interpret it in the light of the framework provided by their experiences, values, culture, and learning. In the organizational context knowledge takes a range of explicit forms and formats, including processes, procedures and documents as well as more tacit forms, including values, beliefs, emotions, judgments, and prejudices. If properly applied, all forms of knowledge can provide the driving force for action . There are two types or concepts of knowledge that are crucial to knowledge management and to using knowledge effectively in the organizational context. The two concepts are generally known as explicit and tacit knowledge.

Explicit knowledge is:

•  Objective and formal knowledge;
•  Tangible information
•  Capable of being codified;
•  Consciously accessible;
•  Easily networked on databases and intranets;

Educational establishments routinely collect huge amounts of information in the form of data about students, their background, their progress, their assessments and their examination results. Harvesting formal and explicit knowledge is essential for the proper functioning of these educational organizations. However, while there is purpose in collecting it, often there is little overall plan within the organization to fully exploit it. It is usually just collected for the task in hand. Often little thought is given as to how it can be exploited for the organization's own long-term benefit, even though the potential power of harnessing it can be enormous. It can be shared and used to create new and useful knowledge. With modern technology it can be downloaded into databases and made accessible over institutions intranets and the Internet. In many educational institutions, if a typical teacher is asked to produce the school organization chart, programme of self evaluation, student recruitment figures, the internal telephone directory, or a list of courses and programmes, it often becomes a chore when it should be a quick and routine activity. It is often said that finding the internal telephone extension takes at least five minutes in the average organization. 

Tacit knowledge is:

•  Socially constructed knowledge;
•  The folklore of the organization;
•  stored inside people's heads;
•  The knowledge of the mastery of a skill;
•  A mix of values, insights, hunches, prejudices, feelings, images, symbols and beliefs;
•  Difficult to codify and to store on databases and intranets;
•  Often difficult to communicate and share;
•  A valuable and rich source of experience and learning.

Philosopher Michael Polanyi sums up the concept in his memorable phrase ‘we know much more than we can tell'. In using this phrase he illustrates how difficult tacit knowledge is to communicate and to share. Tacit knowledge highlights the importance of subjective dimension to knowledge. It is personally and socially embedded knowledge that contains hunches, insights, intuitions, feelings, imagery and emotions. It is deeply rooted in an individual's experience and consciousness and is fashioned by his or her experiences, values and culture. It is the knowledge that helps individuals make sense of their world and as such is often deeply affected by personal beliefs and values.

Implications for Educational Managers

An Educational Manager usually performs many of the following tasks:

•  Implementing educational program
•  Equipping the education centre
•  Preparing financial reports
•  Maintaining health and safety practices
•  Preparing curriculum
•  Supporting staff
•  Attending administrative meetings

Harnessing tacit knowledge requires excellent management, interpersonal and communication skills as well as a good IT infrastructure. Realizing the potential of tacit knowledge involves an enormous culture shift and is a much bigger project than just investing in information technology. It is about trusting and valuing staff. Simply listening to people talk about their personal knowledge is an important activity in an organization and is the reason why appraisals, performance review, feedback sessions, mentoring, exit interviews and other good HR practices are so important. Teamwork and more informal networking and mentoring groups can also be a very useful means of sharing tacit knowledge. As organizations grow, it becomes increasingly unlikely that word of mouth will be an adequate means of conveying all the tacit knowledge that needs to be shared. There will be a need to find more formalized means of sharing. Here, role of Educational Managers is crucial as it involves technical competence in time management; organization of resources and handling an enormous amount of details. For educational organizations tacit knowledge can be shared by promoting Action Researches in the organizations as a good method where an inquiry team investigates an issue and reports their findings back to a wider group. Thus, knowledgeable managers are able to find processes to make tacit knowledge communicable and available to a wider audience wherever possible.  

Conclusion

The focus of Educational Managers needs to be on understanding the dynamics and the psychology of personal knowledge; tacit knowledge is difficult to control in a predictable way. For example, many employees do not recognize that the knowledge they possess is even the property or province of their employers and may see it as their own intellectual capital. In many organizations, individuals perceive their greatest value to be what they know. For them knowledge is power. Their unique information gives them status, and often guarantees that they are listened to and consulted. Bearing these considerations in mind people usually have good reasons to hoard and with hold information. It is the task of educational managers to develop practices that encourage knowledge sharing. It is a key aspect of quality improvement that people can share their knowledge and expertise. Proper teamwork cannot operate without it building up trust is key to knowledge sharing.

(Ms.Swaleha Sindhi is Assistant Professor in The M.S.University of Baroda & Mr.Adfer Shah is Research Assistant in SNCWS, New Delhi.Email:ms.swalehasindhi@rediffmail.com)

Source | http://www.countercurrents.org

Connecting Indian researchers with global knowledge

Connecting Indian researchers with global knowledge

Knimbus has managed to sign up 1,300 users within a short span but it needs to quickly grow its paid user base

Mayur Vaidya from IIT-Madras is pursuing a PhD in material sciences. Till some time ago, he wasn't sure of the content sources relevant to his topic and available through the institute library. His mentor told him about Knimbus and he's been using the online platform since then. As Knimbus is customised to his library subscriptions, he got just those articles in search that he could access. That saves his time and effort in finding content and he also got to know of other publisher platforms.

Knimbus, a Gurgaon-based online start-up, powers researchers to search and collaborate from global resources. While platforms such as Outsell and Simba also do research themselves and offer advisory services, Knimbus restricts itself to search and collaboration.

So, researchers working in the scientific, medical and technical (STM) segment in India or elsewhere or those wanting to co-author technical papers can now look beyond global platforms such as Outsell and Simba Research.

"We wanted to democratise knowledge and spur innovation not just in India but globally as well," says Knimbus' chief executive Rahul Agarwalla, who co-founded the networking site with friend Tarun Arora after they realised that researchers in India had limited access to the global knowledge pool.

Launched in September 2011, this online community was recently in the news for raising a round angel funding of a little over $500,000 from a group of six investors.

The early days
In 2010, Agarwalla, who's neither a techie or from a research background but has an MBA, had just returned from Japan, gung-ho on research and development (R&D). He was working at a Japanese company that created software products and, therefore, had an insight into R&D. A chance conversation with Arora, the CEO of Global Information Systems Technology (GIST), a reseller of information, and a computer science grad with Silicon Valley experience, was all it took to start the journey. The talk was around that India has 20 per cent of the world population but makes for barely two per cent of research. Agarwalla was 36 years and Arora 40 when Knimbus was born. With Agarwalla and Arora, GIST, too, invested in the project. That a researcher needs to collaborate with peers was the basic idea. That a fifth of the world's scientific papers are co-authored internationally, while India is nowhere in the scene, firmed up the venture.

The model was to connect professionals to online content and peer groups to enable discovery, creation and sharing of knowledge in the STM segment.

How it works

Knimbus searches across published scientific content from hundreds of publishers and provides users with a single gateway to millions of journal articles, patents, e-books and course material. It also serves as the largest gateway to open access content from selected publishers and institutional repositories. Users can upload their working documents, datasheets and presentations and make these public to contribute to Knimbus.

At least two users, speaking on condition of anonymity, have said the Knimbus platform's single search window saves time and effort. The key differentiator of the platform is that Knimbus brings together search and social features, enabling knowledge sharing and research collaboration. What users like about Knimbus is it helps them manage most of their information needs, from discovery to organising their content in one place and finally sharing it.

The opportunity

Internationally, STM is a $30-billion industry, while in India the market is valued at $1 billion. Outsell and Simba Research are among the leading US organisations in this area. The business model, an analyst says, is scaleable, as STM has been able to withstand the challenges of the publishing world. The model is believed to be "extremely profitable", with as much as 35 per cent margin.

STM can be divided neatly into two halves: Publishers with online presence making up for an estimated $20 billion of business and value-added online service (a category that Knimbus is part of) at $10 billion, according to experts. While this segment is growing at an average four-five per cent, this value-added segment is showing significant promise at 20 per cent annual growth. "Revenue is shifting, from the traditional STM publishing to online value-added segment," agrees Agarwalla.

Business revolves around a business-to-business (B2B) model with two flavours - free access and advanced, subscription-based institutional version. Apart from 1,000-plus institutes in India, the company has struck partnerships in the US, Germany and Malaysia, among others. These international partners are information resellers such as GIST and get a commission from subscription. While the free access model is no money churner, it builds on the future, when more members convert to the paid format. It is expected as the market matures, the percentage of people shifting to the premium-paid model will grow.

The funding

Two of the angel round investors have told Business Standard it was their private investment.

Sarabjit Singh, partner with a global consultancy and who has worked across financial services, retail, utilities and manufacturing for 20 years, is among the angel investors. "My team and I do a lot of research and this platform is a great solution," says Singh.

Working with global media clients in certain segments, one understands the value of such a tool/network and its potential to grow in segments, including risk management in the corporate world, according to Singh. "Beyond a certain threshold, most of the subscriptions become profitable in this model."

Another investor, Ashwani Singla, CEO of Penn Schoen Berland, a global research-based communication advisory in South Asia, refers to Knimbus as an idea whose time has come. Pointing at the "poverty in research in India", he asks, "How will innovation happen?" That's what prompted Singla to make an independent investment in Knimbus, as it allows researchers to collaborate.

With its global ambition, Knimbus would surely again require money quite soon. "In another six months or so, the company would go for funding once more," says Agarwalla. This time, it will be a different set of investors, he adds. An estimated $3-4 million will be raised next.

Revenue model

Largely a free cloud-based platform, it aims to go paid gradually as it expands globally. It already offers premium paid accounts for a small number of clients. By its own admission, Knimbus wants to be both LinkedIn and Google for researchers. The key difference is in the security and quality of network, according to the founders.

At this point, of the 1,300-odd users, most are accessing for free on the Knimbus platform. Around 40 are paid users, such as the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay, DRDO Lab and nuclear research institutes, to name a few. The cost could be anything from $2,000 to $8,500 an institute a year, depending on the size of an institute. Apart from IITs, National Institutes of Technology (NITs) and government R&D set-ups, users include central and state universities as well.

Singh, who has invested in other companies in private capacity, including a bottom-of-pyramid focused start-up called Swabhimaan, agrees Knimbus' focus is to hit the international market and gain more customers abroad. "This is to make the model more sustainable and present it as an alternative to some of the existing models in research publishing."

With a projection of $140,000 revenue for 2013, the company hopes to turn profitable in 2015. In the first quarter of this calendar year, it clocked a revenue of $30,000. While sellout is clearly an option, Knimbus is looking at long-term growth and international expansion.

Apart from scholarly research sharing, the platform is also being used as an innovative teaching tool. For instance, a professor recently shared his reading list with his class by inviting the students on to it and tagging articles.

Challenges

The challenge, as an analyst points out, is it is both open and secret. The secrecy element is especially true for research relating to DRDO or nuclear energy. It is a team of a litlle over 30, all in their 20s, now at Knimbus, and the numbers are growing. While the current team is either in the technology side or marketing, it depends on outsourced resources for finance and human resources.

The promoters do not take any salary currently. "We are using every penny to grow our business," says Agarwalla.


EXPERT TAKE: Prof Rajat Moona

Knimbus has an interesting concept, which connects researchers and provides mechanisms for collaborations among researchers. It aims to provide a research community framework much on the lines of the social networking except that it is for a specific purpose.

India's research community had faced a major challenge of availability of information for research work from other groups. Such searches are highly specialised, unlike those provided by general purpose search engines.

Bulk of scientific, technical, medical, social and industrial research is carried out in partnership mode as is evident by the number of research papers and patents published with joint authorship. Clearly, there is a demand for such a networking from the research community. Lack of access to the right kind of information, not knowing the sources of knowledge and data for their work, and lack of a platform to network with researchers across the globe are some of the issues faced by researchers while carrying out their research.

It is often said research today is driven by information and computing. The availability of information empowers researchers to carry out quality research. Knimbus aims to fill in this gap and, therefore, likely to have success in connecting researchers together.
 
Source | Business Standard | 7 October 2013